Acadia families on the line: Part 2

Since my arrival at Acadia, I’ve seen many faculty leave, including some very good friends. So why do so many of us stay?
        Before returning home on Friday to tell Gisele of another faculty departure, my buddy Rich and I considered this question. We were having coffee together at Just Us, something we don’t get to do often enough during the term. The CBC camera was filming Wolfville to show how barren it was without the students. The President of Acadia herself walked by and smiled awkwardly. And together we sipped our coffees and talked about what was keeping us here when both of us could go elsewhere and do other things.
        For me, the answer is that I like my job and I like the people I work with. I work in a functional and supportive department. We tend to treat each other with respect and even like each other, despite personal and ideological differences. This positive experience extends beyond my department as well. I’ve met good people from every department on campus. I also know, given my experience with the grievance office, that there are many terrific people in the admin (Unfortunately, some of them have left too.). These people administer the university and the collective agreement guided by the principles of fairness, shunning the arbitrary exercise of power that can make the workplace toxic. And, given my one brief meeting with the BOG (to demonstrate a pedagogical innovation), I know that it contains good people too.
        The fact that so many students have come to Acadia and have had overwhelmingly positive experiences during this troubling decade in the institution’s history is a testament to the quality of the people I work with. While I’m sure that many students have noticed the tensions between faculty and admin during this time (because it is difficult to miss), I know also that many of us have tried to protect them from the toxicity of institutional dysfunction that seeps into our daily lives. That protective shield is meant to be enabling. It’s meant to give students an opportunity to learn in a functional environment. It’s meant to give them the opportunity to engage in a world of ideas, uncontaminated by our local institutional problems (even if they aren’t really local or unique to this institution).
        If that protective shield is now down and our students now exposed, it is because things have gotten so bad that we have no other way of cleaning up the mess we’re in. We must act before toxicity destroys the institution and the fragile ideal it still represents: a quality education. Our commitment to that ideal and to the people who share it unites us on the line. Over these two weeks of walking with my colleagues, that shared commitment has drawn me closer to them and their families. And over the past 11 years, it has kept me and my own family walking with Acadia.

        A quotation from John Donne’s “Meditation XVII” has been haunting me as I’ve been writing this post and contemplating my own reasons for staying in light of one person’s decision to leave:

No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main. If a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe is the less, as well as if promontory were, as well as if a manor of thy friend’s or of thine own were. Any man’s death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind; and therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.

To me, this quotation speaks indirectly to what happens at Acadia when we lose faculty members and their families. The institution and all who work and study here are diminished by the departure. So while I think I know why so many of us stay, I’m still troubled by the fact that for some, things are so bad that they feel the need to leave. I can’t help but feel that we’ve let them down somehow. And I feel their loss.

October 27, 2007. Day 12.

2 Comments

  1. JD replied:

    It is sad to think that things have gotten to the point that people actually want to leave. I agree that your department is functional and supportive, and it seems like that extends to the rest of campus. Of the four universities I’ve been at, it rests in my memory as the most friendly, supportive, and collegial department that I’ve ever been a part of. I witnessed and received extraordinary acts of kindness from members of the department, and for that reason would return in a heartbeat if the chance ever arose, even in the midst of the administrative toxicity. It truly is the people, the profs and the students, that make Acadia such a great place, and I really sympathize with your feeling of loss at seeing some forced to depart.

  2. JD replied:

    When you say “leave”, do you mean “go back on the market and find another job elsewhere” or “leave academia entirely”? I automatically assumed you meant the former, which then raises other questions. I don’t remember seeing it on the list of AUFA’s demands (or at least not at the top), but is AUFA addressing the issue of Acadia granting profs tenure without promotion? We talked about it briefly this summer, and it explained the nagging question I had about how someone could still be on faculty as an Assistant past the 6 or 7 year mark, which is a real anomaly in the academic world. There doesn’t seem to be any rhyme or reason to it; at first I thought it had to do with having a book published or not, but that doesn’t seem to be the case, and it seems rather random and arbitrary. It has occured to me though that Acadia’s strategy of refusing to grant promotion in order to keep profs on a cheaper pay ladder also has the effect of making it impossible for them to leave, or at least to leave in the more conventional sense of going back on the market. Someone with tenure and more than 6 years under their belt simply can’t go on the market looking for other Assistant prof jobs because their profile would raise all kinds of red flags–ie, have they been denied tenure, or, if not, why weren’t they promoted? At the Assistant level, typically 4-5 years is the limit for going back on the market and moving to another university without setting off alarm bells. And if someone is tenured but not promoted, they can’t go on the market for those few Associate positions that are sometimes posted since they aren’t really an Associate at their current institution, even though they would be anywhere else, because again the status difference raises red flags. So it seems to me that Acadia’s tendancy to grant tenure without promotion would effectively trap profs at Acadia and keep them from leaving because it creates a whole new category of profs with an ambiguous status that rarely exists anywhere else. Is AUFA tackling this question this time around, or is this something to deal with next time? Just curious.

Leave a Reply

Trackback URI